This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c?

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Domagoj D <domagoj at engineer dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:03:29 -0800
Subject: Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c?
References: <20051229183917.93B94164278@ws1-4.us4.outblaze.com> <9412DA11-A45A-4D34-A94A-E581C15A361E@apple.com> <m3mzij8zt9.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <2A566763-88D5-4CC1-9C8F-84DEA0EAC44B@apple.com> <m3wthn7j6t.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <01475BC6-13FB-44CF-BFD6-92CC7271BA4B@apple.com> <m3hd8r61el.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

On Dec 29, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

I was actually referring to this case

This is well defined, save for possibly the fact that 4 is written as 4 and not offsetof () and uncontested.

The case I think you're thinking of was upcasting; - offsetof(). It was decided. The decision was that upcasting is allowed.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c?
  - From: Domagoj D
- Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c?
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c?
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c?
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Hack in gcc/c-decl.c?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]