This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: What happened to bubblestrap?
- From: Tobias dot Schlueter at Physik dot Uni-Muenchen dot DE
- To: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
- Cc: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:12:31 +0100
- Subject: Re: What happened to bubblestrap?
- References: <43A26C09.7030604@verizon.net> <43A2870D.5060609@physik.uni-muenchen.de> <43A28A48.4070404@lu.unisi.ch>
Quoting Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@lu.unisi.ch>:
> Yes. "make bubblestrap" is now called simply "make". As Giovanni put
> it a few minutes ago:
>
> "I would also note that using "make" in the cp/ directory at least used
> to build cc1plus with the system compiler, without -Werror and with a
> different set of warnings. There have been many cases where a patch
> tested by C++ rules (which is *not* a full bootstrap, but just "build
> compiler, build libjava, check c++") resulted in a bootstrap failure
> because of a variable not initialized or something. The correct solution
> used to be (guess what!) "make bubblestrap" to build the compiler. Now,
> it's simply the default :)"
Cool. Of course I didn't notice, because the first build after the switch was
from scratch :-)
- Tobi