This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion

From: Florian Weimer <fw at deneb dot enyo dot de>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>, Tobias Schl?ter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 14:47:19 +0200
Subject: Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion
References: <20051019183738.GA7927@troutmask.apl.washington.edu><43569798.1000109@physik.uni-muenchen.de><20051019191650.GA8277@troutmask.apl.washington.edu><1129750569.2177.174.camel@linux-009002219071>

* Daniel Berlin:

> You could simply do non-recursive checkouts (svn co -N) of the dirs you
> want.
> SVN doesn't care how you piece together the working copy.

Doesn't "commit -N" cause the working copy to become fragmented, so
that you cannot issue a working-copy-wide commit or diff anymore?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion
  - From: Steve Kargl

References:
- Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion
  - From: Tobias Schlüter
- Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: RFC: future gfortran development and subversion
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]