This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Paul Eggert <eggert at CS dot UCLA dot EDU>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:59:49 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: proposed Opengroup action for c99 command (XCU ERN 76)
- References: <877jdjqsqc.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Paul Eggert wrote:
> So my question is: Is it a burden on GCC to require interpretation (B)?
Yes, but my position remains that we *should* aim to implement (B) and
this is a proper burden to impose.
For how the interpretations can be distinguished, see bug 9449 comments 21
et seq (especially the examples in comment 39).
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)