This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-2.c: long vs int

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: jakub at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:47:13 -0700
Subject: Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-2.c: long vs int
References: <200508230038.j7N0c1kU020768@greed.delorie.com> <20050823070921.GV15708@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> <200508231828.j7NISjZ6021231@greed.delorie.com>

DJ Delorie wrote:

This certainly wasn't my intention, please change it to 79L.

How's this? It passes both m32c and x86-64.

2005-08-23 DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
	* gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-2.c (main): Make sure long
	constants have the L suffix.

OK.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-2.c: long vs int
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-2.c: long vs int
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/stdarg-2.c: long vs int
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]