This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: please update the gcj main page

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, Bryce McKinlay <mckinlay at redhat dot com>,Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at gmail dot com>, "John M. Gabriele" <john_sips_tea at yahoo dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:50:38 -0400
Subject: Re: please update the gcj main page
References: <20050714170120.42741.qmail@web80903.mail.scd.yahoo.com> <42D763A1.2060608@gmail.com> <42D7D646.8010209@redhat.com> <m3slyflrxn.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508010029200.24596@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <1122850827.32467.42.camel@linux.site> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508010101220.24596@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <1122851829.32467.46.camel@linux.site> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0508010130440.24596@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

On Sun, 31 Jul 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
For code.
I have never seen such claims made for documentation, since it's much
easier to remove and deal with infringing docs than code.
I have seen such statements, by RMS himself.


removing stuff is a remedy for copyright violation, for which
a liability still exists. it is preferable to avoid any
possible infringement in the first place.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: please update the gcj main page
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]