This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: volatile semantics
- From: Paul Schlie <schlie at comcast dot net>
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 08:46:58 -0400
- Subject: Re: volatile semantics
> From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
> | - Just as if given:
> |
> | void foo(void) {
> | int *x = 4;
> | *x = 3;
The point I was attempting to make, was that just because a specified
statement's effective behavior/side-effects are not well defined, it doesn't
mean that it's clearly specified semantic actions may be summarily ignored.