This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy

From: Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Scott Robert Ladd <scott dot ladd at coyotegulch dot com>,Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 03:19:44 +0200
Subject: Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
References: <4295DE66.2050701@coyotegulch.com> <20050526154754.GA10785@redhat.com> <4295F374.6070901@coyotegulch.com> <m3sm09204b.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <429624A8.4030800@coyotegulch.com> <m3ll61myud.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

On 2005-05-27, at 00:00, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

Yeah, the problem with people who work only with angles is that they
tend to forget that sin (and friends) are defined as functions on
*numbers*,....

The problem with people who work only with angles is that they are without sin.

References:
- Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]