This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: karel at iol dot cz
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 16:34:37 -0400
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
References: <17009.2368.986169.753001@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><1116249726.13457.49.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <4288B3FA.40706@coyotegulch.com><200505161717.31407.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl><1116258837.13457.68.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com><200505161846.j4GIkPHi024539@greed.delorie.com> <ea7d1b7bc1d271a315ed0128368dec77@physics.uc.edu><200505161909.j4GJ987W025062@greed.delorie.com> <Pine.LNX.4.63.0505162201080.10815@silence.gardas.net>

> so I assume setting hard ulimit to 128MB will just result in build
> process crashing instead of slowdown and swapping,

We would limit physical ram, not virtual ram.  If you do a "man
setrlimit", I'm talking about RLIMIT_RSS.  The result would be slowing
down and swapping, not crashing.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Karel Gardas

References:
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Karel Gardas

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]