This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: On fold_indirect_ref

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 23:17:20 -0700
Subject: Re: On fold_indirect_ref
References: <428750C7.9050503@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505150850030.740-100000@www.eyesopen.com>

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 09:23:01AM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> Probably the reason that fold_unary
> doesn't call fold_indirect_ref is precisely because it is unsafe.

Probably fold_indirect_ref way way way post-dates fold_unary.


r~

References:
- On fold_indirect_ref
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: On fold_indirect_ref
  - From: Roger Sayle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]