This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is -static a link-only switch?

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: Gary Funck <gary at intrepid dot com>, Gcc Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 11:46:19 -0400
Subject: Re: Is -static a link-only switch?
References: <JCEPIPKHCJGDMPOHDOIGIEGKCOAA.gary@intrepid.com> <20050512154347.GA3406@nevyn.them.org>

On May 12, 2005, at 11:43 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

I don't know of any; it was a close call on one RTOS I worked on
recently, but it turned out that nothing else was necessary.  This sort
of applies to MIPS but that gets a separate option (-fno-pic
-mno-abicalls).

-static on Darwin has an effect but basically -fno-pic.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- Is -static a link-only switch?
  - From: Gary Funck
- Re: Is -static a link-only switch?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]