This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.0.0 Performance Regressions?


On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:04:37AM +0200, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
> You should try and isolate a single BYTEmark test which shows the biggest
> regression. It's better if you manage to pack the whole test as a single
> preprocessed source file. Theoretically, this file should be compilable and
> linkable, and the resulting binary should run for a while doing computations.
> 
> With this kind of help, we can analyze the regression and see why it's slower
> with 4.0.0.
> 
> Giovanni Bajo

It was rather time-consuming but I managed to do it.  I picked the numsort
benchmark which had a serious regression:
	http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485

Jason B.

-- 
"My interest is in the future; I am going to spend the rest of my life
there."
	-- Charles Kettering


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]