This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
- From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
- To: "Peter O'Gorman" <peter at pogma dot com>
- Cc: Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:03:54 -0700
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
- References: <JCEPIPKHCJGDMPOHDOIGIECJCOAA.gary@intrepid.com> <200504272157.21513.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> <17007.61667.295386.348123@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <200504272236.08632.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> <17007.64393.265815.431382@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <m3zmvjlluy.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <20050502085053.D582CE012@quatramaran.ens.fr> <427638C0.9070808@pogma.com>
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 11:27:12PM +0900, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Marc Espie wrote:
> | How about replacing that piece of junk that is called libtool with
> | something else ?
> |
> | Preferably something that works.
>
> <bug-libtool@gnu.org>
> <libtool-patches@gnu.org>
>
> I will be happy to see your bug reports and/or patches. Whining on the gcc
> list has never been known to fix a libtool bug.
I've just submitted Richard Henderson's recent data, showing that 2/3
of the time spent in building libjava is wasted in libtool, along with
detailed logs to back this up, to bug-libtool. We'll all welcome any
improvements the libtool developers can make.