This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > (If test results for a port are so bad that
> > though sent to gcc-testresults they exceed the message size limit, and
> > this remains the case for a prolonged period such as ever since 4.0
> > branched, that also indicates lack of active maintenance.)
>
> No, it could just as well be a problem with the library, as is
> the case for libgfortran; tests still run even though it's
> disabled for mmix-knuth-mmixware. (There's a PR about it
> somewhere, IIRC.)
The *fortran* tests still run (and the front-end is built)
although libgfortran is disabled. It seems I was mistaken about
there being a PR. Hum.
For cris-elf, the fortran tests just FAIL all over due to
missing references to ftruncate, dup and access (not provided by
newlib but apparently assumed by libgfortran).
Last time I checked, there was very little maintaier interest in
getting cross-building and cross-testing to work for fortran. I
myself have no interest in it other than as a testbed.
brgds, H-P