This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before
> Yes, I meant SET_DEST. Do you see how if a SET_DEST is a pseudo
> which did not get a hard register and is equivalent to a readonly
> memory location that the insn is useless?
Yes, I think so: being equivalenced implies that there was a REG_EQUIV note,
so the insn cannot do anything else than setting the pseudo to the value it
is already equivalenced to.