This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++

From: Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic dot com>
To: martin at dalecki dot de
Cc: rth at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jason at redhat dot com, mike at mnmoran dot org, dnovillo at redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:23:32 -0400
Subject: Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
References: <xypfyxtipo1.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com><425E7A55.8050105@mnmoran.org><xypaco1icyz.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com><20050414200433.GA8194@topo.toronto.redhat.com><xypvf6pgi6r.fsf@miranda.boston.redhat.com><20050414231041.GA25624@redhat.com><cdeefd5c3f531728344f4c11462dd54a@dalecki.de>

>>>>> "Marcin" == Marcin Dalecki <martin@dalecki.de> writes:

 Marcin> Templates are a no-go for a well known and well defined
 Marcin> subset for C++ for embedded programming known commonly as
 Marcin> well embedded C++.  

I don't think that's a good argument.  If people want to emasculate
the language, that's their problem.  Especially given that templates
work perfectly well in embedded systems -- we use them (and other
features of real C++) in embedded systems here all the time.

	 paul

References:
- Heads-up: volatile and C++
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
  - From: Michael N. Moran
- Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++
  - From: Marcin Dalecki

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]