Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>]

On Apr 12, 2005, at 3:14 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:

> Daniel Jacobowitz dixit:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:02:06AM -0700, Daniel Kegel wrote:
> > > BTW, I hope -fno-unit-at-a-time doesn't go away until at least 
> > > gcc-4.1.1
> > > or so... I still lean on that crutch.
> >
> > A user!  Can you explain why?
>
> If you're "just" looking for users:
>
> I need -fno-unit-at-a-time because -funit-at-a-time in 3.4 breaks
> ProPolice. Of course, that's totally non-standard, and ProPolice
> will have to be redesigned for gcc 4 anyway, IIRC.
> (Also, with -funit-at-a-time, I get .L123 symbols in the generated
> shared libraries, which I do not get without.)

If it breaks ProPolice, then ProPolice is broken in the first place.
Since at the RTL level there should be no different between
no unit at a time and unit at a time.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski