This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:45:07 +0100
- Subject: Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]
- References: <20050410221314.GA11215@nevyn.them.org><4259AE7A.firstname.lastname@example.org><email@example.com><425A5CDE.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Nathan Sidwell writes:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Might it still be possible for a front end to force all pending code
> > to be generated, even with -fno-unit-at-a-time gone?
> I think this is a bad idea. You're essentially asking for the backend
> to retain all the functionality of -fno-unit-at-a-time.
OK. So, what else?
> Might I refer you to Mike Stump's answer regarding swap :)
I haven't seen it.