This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30


On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 18:48 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:35:47AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:32, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:34:01PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > > I'm rebooting the machine into the previous kernel right now to
> > > > see if it changes things.  Tomorrow's run will use kernel
> > > > 2.6.10-1.760_FC3.
> > >
> > > Well, it seem that the kernel had nothing to do with the problem.
> > > Today's bootstrap time was 7,960 seconds.
> > 
> > My suspect is still the ::bind patch.  Unfortunately you don't
> > keep times of libstdc++v3 build times.  Not sure how to check
> > this, except maybe rolling back libstdc++ to March 30...
> 
> Except that would have shown up in Jim's test...
> 

So just so we are clear on the state:

Jim works on a <insert details here> machine:

Sees no difference in compile times from 03-29 -> 04-01

Diego works on a <insert details here> machine

Sees 50% difference in compile times from 03-29->04-01, starting on
03-30





Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]