This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Kai Henningsen <kaih at khms dot westfalen dot de>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:28:49 -0700
Subject: Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
References: <c2be513156e77e58189807976b82956f@apple.com> <424DB7FA.8080805@codesourcery.com> <84fc9c0005040113174beaf998@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c0005040113174beaf998@mail.gmail.com> <424DBED0.2040700@codesourcery.com> <9UBSTAXXw-B@khms.westfalen.de>

On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 04:25:00PM +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> Well, yes and no - I sometimes think that gcc doesn't have *enough* knobs.

Lots of knobs <=> inadequate testing and failures when users issue a
combination of knob settings that have never been tested.

That's why I find Gentoo rather frightening. :-)

References:
- RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Kai Henningsen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]