This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
Cc: gcc List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 13:07:06 -0800
Subject: Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <c2be513156e77e58189807976b82956f@apple.com> <424D9FD6.8020300@codesourcery.com> <a4ea4772ef672a435c7ecb04125831b7@apple.com>

Dale Johannesen wrote:

Agree. (And documentation will be written.)

Yay. It sounds like we're definitely on the same page. I think that as long as we keep the semantics clear, this will be useful functionality.

That's what I assumed. Anything finer than that is insane. :-)

Actually there are cases where it makes sense: you could ask that a particular call be inlined, or a particular loop be unrolled N times.

True. Consider my remark regarding insanity qualified to whole-function optimizations. :-)

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Dale Johannesen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]