This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>, gcc List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 11:36:56 -0800
Subject: Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <c2be513156e77e58189807976b82956f@apple.com> <424D9FD6.8020300@codesourcery.com> <20050401193449.GA3748@topo.toronto.redhat.com>

Diego Novillo wrote:

On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 11:24:06AM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Dale Johannesen wrote:
So I guess question 1 is, Mark, do you feel negatively enough about this
feature to block its acceptance in mainline?
I'm not sure that I *could* block it, but, no, I don't feel that negatively.
I don't mind either way.  But I do have a question, what's the
granularity of this #pragma?  Function-level, I hope?

That's what I assumed. Anything finer than that is insane. :-)

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Dale Johannesen
- Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]