This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Merging calls to `abort'

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:27:32 -0800
Subject: Re: Merging calls to `abort'
References: <SERRANOpbqT1qDL0gcA0000005d@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <buobr9kbcp2.fsf@mctpc71.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> <20050329101104.7F8D1C824@quatramaran.ens.fr>

RMS wrote:
> >GCC's primary purpose is to be the compiler for the GNU system.  It is
> >used for many other purposes too, and it is good for GCC to serve more
> >purposes, but they're not as important for the GNU Project, even
> >though they are all important for some users.

On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 12:11:04PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> I'm a wee little bit fed up of that argument.

So, Marc, why do you revive a discussion that took place two weeks ago?
You completely ignored all subsequent discussion, just to get a shot in
at RMS.  Are you trying to bait him into a flame war on a public list?
Or are you just way behind in your reading?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Merging calls to `abort'
  - From: Marc Espie

References:
- RE: Merging calls to `abort'
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Merging calls to `abort'
  - From: Miles Bader
- Re: Merging calls to `abort'
  - From: Marc Espie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]