This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:30:20 -0800
Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <200503241929.j2OJT9dp018810@sirius.codesourcery.com> <200503250831.37528.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

Eric Botcazou wrote:

20263 SPARC64 ASM bug

Eric has a patch; I've asked about possible other ways to fix it.

I've answered, but probably not very constructively as your remark was not crystal-clear either. :-) Btw, I think you should "Add CC" you when you comment on specific PRs in order to speed up the discussion.

OK. (FWIW, you're not on the CC: list for that PR either.)

Note that the patch has been approved by Roger for 4.x, so it should already have been checked in, had I not run into technical contingencies lately.

Great; I shan't second-guess then.

However the same problem is present in 3.4.x for the C++ compiler (but is not a regression there) so I'd like you to make a decision for that branch too.

I'd prefer not to apply this for 3.4.

Thanks,

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]