This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Greg Schafer <gschafer at zip dot com dot au>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 12:06:33 +0100
Subject: Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer
References: <20050325054944.GA29022@tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au> <200503250841.31777.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20050325104820.GA30917@tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au>

> Umm.. you've missed my point.

Not really if you read correctly. :-)  I was saying that the compilers are 
not meant to be identical in the general case.

> To reiterate, this is different behaviour from past GCC releases, and it
> appears wrong to me.

What is wrong exactly?  Why should 2 different build processes generate the 
same executable?  Is there a (written) rule about this?

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Greg Schafer

References:
- BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Greg Schafer
- Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer
  - From: Greg Schafer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]