This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?

From: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
To: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, stevenb at suse dot de, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>, roger at eyesopen dot com
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:06:54 -0800
Subject: Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
References: <20050322.111420.35015524.kazu@cs.umass.edu>

On Mar 22, 2005, at 8:14 AM, Kazu Hirata wrote:

After all, all we need in get_callee_fndecl seems to be

  addr = TREE_OPERAND (call_expr, 0);
  return ((TREE_CODE (addr) == ADDR_EXPR
	   && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (addr, 0)) == FUNCTION_DECL)
	  ? TREE_OPERAND (addr, 0) : NULL_TREE;

Thoughts?

In Objective C (and ObjC++) it's also a good idea to look under OBJ_TYPE_REF. See this patch, which was deferred to 4.1 and I'm going to resubmit RSN: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/txt00122.txt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
  - From: Kazu Hirata

References:
- Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
  - From: Kazu Hirata

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]