This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- To: rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 20 Mar 05 14:33:49 EST
- Subject: Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index
> Depends what the type is. If it's an array type, then there's no
> simple equivalent expression.
using CONSTRUCTOR node?
What I mean by "simple" is something that's easy to derive. Suppose I have
a record with numerous fields of various sizes and I unchecked convert a
constant to it. Yes, I could write code to convert that into a CONSTRUCTOR
by figuring out what value should be assigned to each field, but that's a
pretty large block of code for a pretty marginal case.