This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Questions about trampolines

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: Russell Shaw <rjshaw at netspace dot net dot au>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 00:29:26 -0500
Subject: Re: Questions about trampolines
References: <1110745459.14219.83.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4234D2CB.1010703@adacore.com> <4235CA05.1040409@evcohs.com> <4235D2DB.7020409@adacore.com> <4235DEF3.8070204@mnmoran.org> <4235F801.5080506@adacore.com> <42360862.6000707@mnmoran.org> <42360B6D.7040505@evcohs.com> <42363850.1090301@netspace.net.au>

Russell Shaw wrote:
=

How is a pointer to a nested function any different to a pointer to
an un-nested function? Why need trampolines?


Because you need the static link, do some research on the
use of static links if you don't understand that.

References:
- Questions about trampolines
  - From: Øyvind Harboe
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: E. Weddington
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: Michael N. Moran
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: E. Weddington
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: Russell Shaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]