This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Questions about trampolines

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, espie at nerim dot net,"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>,Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:25:28 -0500
Subject: Re: Questions about trampolines
References: <1110745459.14219.83.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050314131151.DF6A6E163@quatramaran.ens.fr> <42358F85.5070004@adacore.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503141323320.21688@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20050314134335.GA7831@tetto.home> <jeu0nenxdb.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20050314161616.GB29522@lucon.org>

H. J. Lu wrote:

If we want to remove nested functions from glibc and keep code reuse,
I can try to provide a patch.


Just make sure that there are no instances of pointers to these
functions being taken. As long as there are no trampolines, there
seems to be no good argument for messing with the code here.

References:
- Questions about trampolines
  - From: Øyvind Harboe
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: Marc Espie
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: Marc Espie
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Questions about trampolines
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]