This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: New pexecute interface

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, dj at redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:29:50 -0800
Subject: Re: RFC: New pexecute interface
References: <20050307210052.24680.qmail@gossamer.airs.com><87d5u9gysl.fsf@codesourcery.com> <m33bv573io.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> writes:

> If you do use PEX_SAVE_TEMPS, then the caller provides the base name
> and the suffix, and the caller is responsible for making good
> choices.

It doesn't look like the caller can specify a different base name for
each stage in the pipeline, is the thing.

zw

References:
- RFC: New pexecute interface
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: RFC: New pexecute interface
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: RFC: New pexecute interface
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]