This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros

From: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
To: dave dot korn at artimi dot com
Cc: zack at codesourcery dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:58:58 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
References: <20050228.094056.74752975.kazu@cs.umass.edu><SERRANOFRaqbC8wSA1X00000026@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

Hi Dave,

>   I'm basically in agreement with you here, and just want to suggest you can
> avoid an awful lot of code duplication by doing something like
> 
> #ifdef REG_OK_STRICT
> #define ${CPU}_IS_STRICT 1
> #else 
> #define ${CPU}_IS_STRICT 0
> #endif

Sure.  In fact, the FRV port and possible others have already started
doing this like so:

#ifdef REG_OK_STRICT
#define REG_OK_STRICT_P 1
#else
#define REG_OK_STRICT_P 0
#endif

Kazu Hirata

References:
- Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- RE: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]