This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Extension compatibility policy

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
To: "Marc Espie" <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>
Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:18:36 +0100
Subject: Re: Extension compatibility policy
References: <pan.2005.02.26.19.57.52.648712@navi.cx> <20050227140225.296C71C6@quatramaran.ens.fr>

Marc Espie <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr> wrote:

> Personally, I would even say that it would be *great* if gcc would
> start warning if you use any extension, unless you explicitly disable
> those warnings... (except for __extension__ in header files, and then
> I've stumbled upon situations where it hurts still).

That is *exactly* what -pedantic is meant to be. If it does not, patches are
welcome.

Giovanni Bajo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Extension compatibility policy
  - From: Robert Dewar

References:
- Extension compatibility policy
  - From: Mike Hearn
- Re: Extension compatibility policy
  - From: Marc Espie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]