This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:54:15 -0800
Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <200502031949.j13JnNNp008162@sirius.codesourcery.com> <200502090027.49199.steven@gcc.gnu.org> <420957A1.50206@codesourcery.com> <200502092207.01915.steven@gcc.gnu.org> <420A98B0.6060803@codesourcery.com> <Pine.BSF.4.62.0502171351240.9756@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <20050217173042.GB17512@synopsys.com>

Joe Buck wrote:

It depends.  If someone wants a confidential "sanity check" on a proposal
before making it public, I don't much care (though Mark might find himself
overburdened if he's in charge of all sanity checking, because people mail
only him).  But any private communication between a proposer and Mark
should only be a first step; real development discussions should take
place on this list.

I completely agree.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-02-03)
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]