This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] fold Reorganization Plan


Mark Mitchell wrote:-

> However, while that may be necessary for Java, it's not necessary for 
> C++.  In C++, fold should only be called for "integral constant 
> expressions", which, by definition, are made up of simple operations on 
> integers.  (It's a little more complicated than that, but all the 
> operands collapse to integers immediately.)  So, all we really need for 
> C++ is the ability to convert floating-point constants to integer 
> constants, and the ability to do basic arithmetic on integer constants. 

I think it's desirable for front-ends to be able to fold floating
point constant expressions too, no?  It can be handy for diagnostics
such as detecting overflow or unreachable code based on conditionals
whose expression is a floating one, albeit constant.

Neil.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]