This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Details for svn test repository


Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:


All we should be trying to do at this stage is get to a new VCS that
is no worse than CVS on the axes we care about.  I can't see any
fundamental reason that we couldn't go back and add history later, if
that's compelling and someone wants to do it.  The same goes for file
rename information: we're getting by without that now, and we can add
it in later if need be.


You could be right, but I don't see how.  Once you've set the revision
numbers, can you really go back and insert earlier revision numbers?
Once you've created revisions in which files are not renamed, can you
really insert the file renames?  I don't think that would be would
minor hacking; I think it would be major surgery on the revision
control data.

We'd recreate the repository, just like we're doing now. I understand that's got collateral impact on people who have their mirrored versions of the repository, etc., but I just don't see that as a big deal.


Getting the old history in now, on the other hand, is minor hacking.
I'm perfectly willing to do some work to get it to happen.

If you make it happen, that's fine by me. I don't see anything wrong with having old history. I just don't think it should in any way be a gating factor.


--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]