This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Test result email failure
Below are the summaries. The compiler can't be that broken. After all
it managed to bootstrap and build the libraries. Although I have to
admit that there seem to be a lot of failures. Maybe some of the tests
are broken on the platform?
Since this, I have rebuilt the compiler with --enable-nls and adding
f77 and java to langauges. Currently I am stuck on java, but it
appears to be a header issue on the host dues to wreckage of previous
gcc compilers. I have asked the admins to fix it.
Bill Northcott
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 8227
# of unexpected failures 1262
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 67
# of unresolved testcases 25
# of untested testcases 30
# of unsupported tests 83
/home/bank/s9573347/src/GNU/gcc-build-7Feb/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version
3.4.3
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 11826
# of unexpected failures 7001
# of expected failures 61
# of unresolved testcases 5127
# of untested testcases 322
# of unsupported tests 353
/home/bank/s9573347/src/GNU/gcc-build-7Feb/gcc/xgcc version 3.4.3
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 308
# of unexpected failures 536
# of unresolved testcases 508
# of unsupported tests 8
/home/bank/s9573347/src/GNU/gcc-build-7Feb/gcc/xgcc version 3.4.3
Compiler version: 3.4.3
Platform: alphaev56-dec-osf5.1
configure flags: --prefix=/home/bank/s9573347 --disable-nls
--with-gc=simple --with-stabs --disable-threads
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc --enable-shared --program-suffix=-3.4
On 09/02/2005, at 10:40 AM, Joe Buck wrote:
Maybe you could give us a summary of it.
How many lines in it begin with FAIL: ?
....
To get such a huge output, probably almost all of your tests are
failing,
due to some major breakage like a completely nonfunctional compiler.