This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration?
- From: "Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp dot com>" <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
- To: joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com
- Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>, 'Steven Bosscher' <stevenb at suse dot de>, 'Eric Botcazou' <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, 'Thorsten Glaser' <tg at 66h dot 42h dot de>, gpc at gnu dot de
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:02:36 -0600
- Subject: Re: [gpc] Re: GCC integration?
- Organization: OAR Corporation
- References: <NUTMEGtM1qjj0aImPiZ0000084f@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <41C2D168.5090306@OARcorp.com>
- Reply-to: joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com
Joel Sherrill <joel@OARcorp.com> wrote:
Dave Korn wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of Steven Bosscher
Sent: 17 December 2004 12:02
On Dec 17, 2004 12:37 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Not sure what is your sampling base,
Apparently one that's not very representative. I looked
at a bunch of distro home pages and used Google.
but the latest Mandrake is 3.4-based for example.
Cool.
Gr.
Steven
Cygwin is currently in the process of migrating from 3.3 -> 3.4 as
well.
The last release branch of RTEMS used 3.2 but the development head
is in the process of moving to 3.4 with some testing against the
head.
The tighter warning and error checks have resulted in work to
get rid of warnings. We try very hard to be warning free.
I should have also mentioned that gcc 3.3.4 isn't error free
from our perspective. The ARM soft-float issue, C++ on
MIPS doesn't honor the same Gn setting as C defaults to,
and a couple of compilation problems.
And our perspective is strictly on C and C++. Building Ada
has had its own set of issues that haven't bubbled to the top
of our worries.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985