This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
wrong-code regressions review
- From: neroden at fastmail dot fm (Nathanael Nerode)
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:52:09 -0500
- Subject: wrong-code regressions review
So, the bugs I worry about most are wrong-code regressions. :-)
What strikes me most about these 25 bugs is the ones which appear
close to being fixed, but have sort of stalled.
Appear stalled (5):
17913:
Patch available, needs global maintainer review
17053:
Collect2 bug. DJE said in August that he was developing a fix; no
news since then.
18257:
Tentative patch in October, no news since then
18191:
Should default initializers be produced in the front end? If so,
this should have its component changed and be cloned.
18019:
Pentium4. Jan said he would write a patch "today" on the 2nd, no news
since then
13300:
"Withdrawn" patches, because of lack of review. Still needed. :-(
Appear in good shape (4):
15486:
Fixed, fix being committed :-)
18666:
Probably not-a-bug
18888:
Jeff Law is actively working on it, I think.
18665:
Patches in progress, should be fixed soon
Unknown (8):
17949:
IVOPTS alignment bug.
18241:
Not tracked down yet.
18628:
Difficult interaction between passes, needs a CFG guru
18897:
Analyzed, no patch yet
18785:
Not much progress yet
17603:
Not yet tracked down.
18916:
No idea.
18987:
New, no idea.
Don't look like anyone cares (7):
10692:
Nobody's looking at it because nobody maintains m68k. ;-/
14798:
SH problems; SH maintainers have not looked at it, as far as I can see.
18701, 18330, 18346, 18329:
MMIX problems, no analysis.
18170:
No analysis. m32r maintainer has not commented.
--
This space intentionally left blank.