Re: Making strings of arbitrary character types

[Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>]

Hi,

> But with GCC 3.4.2, basic_string<unsigned char> works out of the box.
>
> Does 3.4.2 provide a specialization for this type (and possibly others)?
> If so, is it intentional (ie. can I expect it in future versions)?  Or
> should I specialize char_traits for portability?
Hey, this is Free Software, no mysteries! ;)

Have a look to include/bits/char_traits.h, there are plenty of 
interesting comments
and info. You will learn that a "generalization" of char_traits is now 
provided, which
often will work out of the box for many POD types besides char and wchar_t.
However, you will also learn that some typedef and eof() are likely to 
be wrong,
in general (are Ok for unsigned char, by the way, and other "simple" cases)

Indeed, this is an *intentional* improvement, and you can expect it to 
be present at
least in the whole 3.4.x series and the forthcoming 4.0.x series. You 
are also right,
however, that the fully portable solution involves providing your own 
char_traits
(probably, you can master that by studying the above file!)

Thanks,
Paolo.