Re: Passing temprary by reference requires copy constructor in 3.4?

[Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>]

> > Indeed, however seems that std commitee is removing the restriction. 
> > Hence I would like to see a flag to disable the error (if there is not one 
> > already and I am just not aware of it). I am refering to the DR 391.
>
> Why, the DR is still active so GCC is correct as of right now.
> If and when the DR goes to defect, we will implement the needed
> change.  But currently GCC is following the standard.

It could be material for -fpermissive.  But surely not now that mainline 
is stage3.

Paolo