This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo at libero dot it>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 17:32:00 +0100
Subject: Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
References: <co397v$tju$1@sea.gmane.org> <84fc9c000411250144650a2a46@mail.gmail.com> <1101400119.6587.2.camel@linux.site>
Reply-to: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>

On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:28:39 -0500, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 10:44 +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> 
> > Can't we have a caused-by-patch field in bugzilla where we could link the patch
> > causing the failure and a caused-by field with the author (and
> > automatically CC'ing
> > him)?  I don't think it is a great idea overloading the assigned-to field.
> 
> Everytime you ask me to add another custom field, God kills a kitten.
> Please, think of the kittens.

Don't kittens have nine lifes? :)

Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- RE: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
  - From: Dave Korn

References:
- [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [RFC] Auto-assign regressions (maintainers, read!)
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]