This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?

From: Rogelio Serrano <rogelio dot serrano at gmail dot com>
To: Ziemowit Laski <zlaski at apple dot com>
Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>, GNUStep <discuss-gnustep at gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:57:40 +0800
Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
References: <442C1616-387F-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de> <C949FF38-2681-48A5-94D9-0228551C5902@apple.com> <m2is82okds.fsf@greed.local> <3D92B030-39C3-11D9-8317-00039390FFE2@apple.com>
Reply-to: Rogelio Serrano <rogelio dot serrano at gmail dot com>

[snipped...]
> So, the current status is:
>     (a) Geoff has refused to provide an acceptable design;
>     (b) Geoff has objected to all other designs presented.
> 
> --Zem
[snipped...]

Well i can live with patches to mainline gcc. Maybe i can start tesing
gcc-improvements-branch again.

References:
- Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
  - From: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
  - From: Geoffrey Keating
- Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0?
  - From: Ziemowit Laski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]