Re: Please review 3.4 patches

[Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>]

Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:01:47PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00795.html
> >
> > This last one, at least, is clearly wrong.
> >
> > You're now defaulting to --enable-shared, even on systems that may not 
> > support shared libraries at all.
> >
> > What's wrong with Joe's suggested solution: set LD_LIBRARY_PATH when 
> > running programs from the stage1/ or stage2/ directories?
> >
> > Also, do we have a list of the patches that went in post GCC 3.4.2 that 
> > are causing problems?  I want to know what we will have to take out if 
> > we have to take things out.
>
>
> I think the libunwind patch is the most problematic one and should not made
> it into the stable branch, just HEAD (and even there I don't like it very
> much).

Can you produce a candidate reversion patch that we could consider for 
the 3.4 branch?

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com