This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(041024) on MICO sources




On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Jan Hubicka wrote:

My bet: GC allocating lots and lots of bitmaps :-/

Probably.


Here's the interesting question:
If these bitmaps live over compilation, and we know exactly when they die
(cgraph_reset_static_var_maps), why the heck are they gc allocated?
Ineed ;)

Also the current usage of these bitsmaps is disabled and Kenny already
has patch that reduce good amount of them when inlining takes place.
We probably need to decide what to do about mainline - either disable
collecting the information too or try harder to fix it.

If his patch to fix this stuff up for the mainline (which was submitted and is awaiting review from you and diego, i believe, since it touches cgraph and tree-ssa) isn't accepted, we should probably disable it until 4.1


> > Honza



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]