Re: Compiling GCC With a C++ Compiler (g++)

[Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>]

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:47:06PM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Phil Edwards <phil@codesourcery.com> writes:
> 
> | The const should stay; C is not C++, and the way in which write-once
> 
> Most certainly C is not C++, and nobody is arguing otherwise.
> However, there is a large and good intersection of both languages
> where useful programs can be expressed through constructs with defined
> meaning. 

I'm not going to get involved in this discussion again, at least not until
we've agreed to throw out C as the implementation language.  I'll agree to
any patch which will get me out of the Cc: list of this eternal thread.  :-(


-- 
Behind everything some further thing is found, forever; thus the tree behind
the bird, stone beneath soil, the sun behind Urth.  Behind our efforts, let
there be found our efforts.
              - Ascian saying, as related by Loyal to the Group of Seventeen