This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Protocol error: too many arguments

From: Christopher Faylor <me at cgf dot cx>
To: overseers at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Dave Korn <dk at artimi dot com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:31:13 -0400
Subject: Re: Protocol error: too many arguments
References: <16747.55825.15791.451066@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <NUTMEGwG8nlsjH1dsDb000003dd@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Reply-to: overseers at gcc dot gnu dot org

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 03:14:14PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gcc-owner On Behalf Of Andrew Haley
>> Sent: 12 October 2004 14:20
>
>> Dave Korn writes:
>
>>  >   Should probably Cc overseers, as a heads-up.
>> 
>> Any mail I send to overseers bounces.
>
>I had that problem the other day last time we had a fileattr bug.
>Turns out you have to be sure what domain you're trying to mail
>overseers at.  The overseers name only exists at sources / redhat /
>com; you can't email it at gcc / gnu / org, or you get a SMTP "550
>unknown user" error.
>
>Hey, Overseers, is that deliberate?

No.  I can't imagine how we'd even accomplish such a feat since gcc.gnu.org
and sources.redhat.com are the same system.

I guess, if this mail makes it through, it will prove or disprove your theory.

cgf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Protocol error: too many arguments
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- RE: Protocol error: too many arguments
  - From: Andrew Haley
- RE: Protocol error: too many arguments
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]