This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Undefined static functions

On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:31:09AM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> This does rather make me wonder whether what check_global_declarations 
> does after warning,
> 
>           /* This symbol is effectively an "extern" declaration now.  */
>           TREE_PUBLIC (decl) = 1;
> 
> is particularly safe.

Doesn't sound like it.  I guess the reason it works is that 
encode_section_info has already done its job, and we don't
call back into it now.

> ... defining TREE_NO_WARNING to apply 
> to decls as well as expressions looks safer.

TREE_NO_WARNING *does* apply to decls.  See warn_uninit in tree-ssa.c.


r~
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]