This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ada policy (was: GCC 3.5 Status (2004-08-29))


    The scenario I want to avoid is that we first reach 100% ACATS pass on
    the two targets (looks likely), then later a patch goes in that
    introduces 20 ACATS regressions on those two targets and the patch is
    not fixed or reverted following the usual rules for other components. 

Yes, but that's a *different* standard.  What you are talking about
if whether the commit rules will require running ACATS to commit a
patch.  The question raised was whether Ada should be part of the
release criteria.

These are not the same.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]