This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++


Roger Sayle wrote:

On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Mark Mitchell wrote:


Roger, I'd say that if the effecient, safe way to fix the 3.4 regression
is to make TYPE_PRECISION the width of the underlying type, and that
doesn't break anything else, that's an acceptable change, especially for
a release branch.



Sure. I'll bootstrap and regression test your 2003-07-25 patch, together with some new testcases so that we'll know what to expect in future.

Out of interest could you try compiling the example code given in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-08/msg01129.html with EDG and let
me know whether it aborts or passes?


It passes.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark@codesourcery.com


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]