This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Help with bit-field semantics in C and C++


On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> PR 10796 was the motivation for the current implementation.

I notice that in a follow-up patch, only committed to the 3.3 branch
you used the ChangeLog entry:

        PR c++/10796
        * decl.c (finish_enum): Make sure the underlying integer type has
        the same precision as some full integer type.  Reverts part
        2003-06-27's patch that didn't play any role in fixing the PR.

which suggests that the change in TYPE_PRECISION wasn't necessary to
fix this PR.  I'll hunt back through the archives to catch up on the
relevant discussions.  For example, I've no idea what DR377 resolved.

Roger
--


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]